This book offers a collection of the essays, letters, interviews, and correspondence of Fr Matthew Baker, exploring the works of Fr Georges Florovsky and the writings of the Church Fathers.
‘The Fathers are ahead of us, with Jesus—it is we who should be running to catch up to them.’ Thus Fr Matthew Baker, in one of the interviews included in this volume, summarizes and defends the understanding of Orthodox theological method espoused by his hero, Fr Georges Florovsky, known as neopatristic synthesis. We tend to be programmed in Western societies into thinking that simply by virtue of living in the twenty-first century, we are somehow ‘ahead,’ that we are intellectually, morally, and theologically superior to our forebears just because we happen to live later than they did, and in an age of technological marvels. But the measure of what puts us ‘ahead’ as human beings is neither time nor technology, but our proximity to Jesus Christ. This is what allows the category of the Fathers to remain a steadfast one in Orthodox theology: not simply because in the distant past they forged lasting and faithful expressions of the Gospel, but because in doing so they assimilated the very life of the One they sought to defend and glorify, the Coming One, thereby becoming living witnesses before us (not just behind us) to the only truth that can save human beings….
REV. MATTHEW BAKER, PH.D. was an adjunct professor in theology at Hellenic College/Holy Cross Greek Orthodox School of Theology. He published numerous articles and edited multiple books on Fr Georges Florovsky as well as patristics, theology, Scripture, and philosophy more broadly.
All I can say is this: wow, and I wish there were more. We see many facets of the brilliant and God-given mind Fr. Matthew Baker had within this anthology. We see the scholar, the theologian, the pastor, the homilist, the friend, and above all, the servant of the Lord Jesus Christ. There is a *lot* of material in this book, and because of such, I would encourage you to read it in a certain order to derive the most benefit from it: I would personally recommend reading the sermons first, the letters second, the interviews third, and the reviews/papers last. I say this simply because not everyone that reads this book will necessarily care to know about current scholarship pertaining to Florovsky, Zizoulas, or Bulgakov, as great as it is. I think doing this will provide a better presentation and a more wholistic comprehension of Fr Matthew’s genius for the average lay person reading this book. While the essays & reviews as well as the interviews are amazing in their own respects (within his essays, my personal favorites were his reflections on Apollinarianism, Athanasius & Sonship, and Ephraim, and would at bare minimum recommend you read these if you skimp out on this part…but don’t do that!), I was particularly drawn both to Fr Matthew’s extremely profound insight & commentary on certain tendencies of thought within modern Orthodox circles, but also to the life and gospel truth that his homilies convey to the reader. It is my hope that future Orthodox writers/thinkers incorporate much of the wisdom found in this book in the future, as I think many needed correctives are here, most especially within Anglophone Orthodoxy.
As a parting gift, here’s a passage from his sermon ‘Priesthood and Sacrifice’:
“All of us here… have weaknesses, profound limitations, of which we may or may not be aware. All of us have encountered crosses in life, some of them very painful; crosses which perhaps we did not choose—crosses which we are probably still learning how to bear with thanksgiving. And further, each of us here—every baptized man, woman, and child— has been called by God. He has called us to be sharers in Christ’s “royal priesthood”: to make the whole of our lives—our work, our rest and play, and all of our relationships—a living sacrifice to God.
This is a high calling, an arduous task. Yet I suggest we can make a start today by beginning, not with our strengths, but with our weaknesses. If we can look realistically at our own deep limitations—the ways in which we so often fail in bearing our own crosses—then perhaps we can begin to approach others with that gentleness which—as one of the Desert Fathers said—comes of remembering that “each and every person we meet is engaged in a deep and bitter struggle.” Then we can begin to see the wounds which we have received in life for what they truly are: a way in which the Lord is preparing us to bring healing to others. We can begin to exercise the priestly virtue of compassion. As in the Holy Eucharist itself, our very brokenness can become the opening through which life may be shared with others. Then our crosses truly become the holy cross. By coming to terms with our own weakness, by showing gentleness towards the weaknesses of others, we can begin to make our whole life a sacrifice: a priestly offering to God, through Jesus Christ our great High Priest. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood, and hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him be glory and dominion forever and ever. Amen. (Rev 1.5-6).”
We need more of Fr Matthew’s stuff published! Memory eternal, Fr Matthew!
Those who knew Fr. Matthew of blessed memory should know how deeply he has impacted so many of us who have become more familiar with him only in recent years. This was precisely what I was looking for in terms of a collection of his writings and thought, from pastoral to theological. Reading this book, one can truly understand what a unique thinker he was, and it seems a true blessing to know that his legacy will live on through this witness.
As Florovsky thought of the Fathers, and as Baker thought of Florovsky, it is not inappropriate to add the theological achievements of Fr Matthew Baker to this precious lineage and inheritance of Orthodox theology. This is an inheritance we do not merely seek to excavate or look back on, but a living inheritance that we have a duty to pursue, ‘to catch up with,’ as we strive to be faithful witnesses to ‘him which is, and which was, and which is to come’ (Rev 1.4).